<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for And the horse you rode in on ...</title>
	<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com</link>
	<description>Random rants and curious explanation.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Banker Bingo by Al</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/05/08/big-banker-bingo/#comment-851</link>
		<author>Al</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 03:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/05/08/big-banker-bingo/#comment-851</guid>
					<description>Great exchange!  Good old Barney Frank.  Price is a good example of how completely tone-deaf the Republicans have become (and how transparent the greed factor has become), and they're going to pay dearly for it come November.  Even people who have never had any stomach for economic details are beginning to understand how they've been lied to and victimized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great exchange!  Good old Barney Frank.  Price is a good example of how completely tone-deaf the Republicans have become (and how transparent the greed factor has become), and they&#8217;re going to pay dearly for it come November.  Even people who have never had any stomach for economic details are beginning to understand how they&#8217;ve been lied to and victimized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Banker Bingo by mike</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/05/08/big-banker-bingo/#comment-850</link>
		<author>mike</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/05/08/big-banker-bingo/#comment-850</guid>
					<description>Proving your point is the great Barney Frank talking on News Hour Thursday in regards to Republican opposition to any federal assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure which is unacceptable to the Reps but the Bear Stearns bailout was fine.

REP. TOM PRICE: Well, how -- how do you get to the bottom of this housing problem and challenge that we have? You get to the bottom when the market determines that housing prices have fallen to an appropriate amount. And, hopefully, we still believe that markets ought to be how we determine what housing prices ought to be, and not that the government ought to be determining that.

When we get to that bottom, then housing prices will -- the demand will increase and housing prices will begin to come up. You can't artificially change that by congressional action, by governmental action.

When you try to do that, all you do is manipulate the market and, I believe, prolong the challenges and the pain that -- that we're feeling. And, just as a point on that $300 billion, it's extremely important. The chairman is very accurate in what he says all the time. And he's very accurate in what he puts in bills. And the $300 billion is in there for a reason.

It's because that's the ultimate exposure if in fact the worst thing would happen -- were to happen. And that's important to appreciate.

REP. BARNEY FRANK: That's the silliest thing people will hear today, even if they watch the Cartoon Network. That would be if every mortgage totally failed, and you recovered nothing from it.

By the way, I probably shouldn't have been here, because Mr. Price could have debated himself, because when he says have the government stay out of the market, that contradicts his bragging about FHA Secure and the HOPE NOW, which were also government interventions in the market.

MARGARET WARNER: Congressman...

REP. BARNEY FRANK: So, there's just a total contradiction here about what you do or don't do.

MARGARET WARNER: OK.

But, Congressman Frank, let me get you to respond to Congressman Price's point that, essentially, by doing this, you're creating a -- basically a false floor under house prices and that the only way to get out of this is just let them fall where they're going to fall and then come back.

REP. BARNEY FRANK: Well, the answer, first of all, is, if he really believed that, he wouldn't be bragging about FHA Secure and the other federal program. So, there's a kind of contradiction there.

Secondly, no, this is not stopping prices from going. As a matter of fact, this begins with the holders of the mortgages being told, you better reduce the amount you think you're going to get.

And we are only going to give a guarantee if they get down to 85 percent of the appraised value. The government isn't appraising. The government is going to rely on private appraisers. No, we assume prices are going to be going down. And there's nothing in here that's going to stop prices from going down.

Again, the lender is being told, you're not going to get what that mortgage says. And, by the way, that's 85 percent of the value of the house. It will be less than 85 percent of the value of these loans, because the loans are above the value of the house. So, we're telling the lender, you're going to have to take a very substantial reduction in what you thought you could get if you want to participate in this.

And, so, there's no -- no one is stopping the market from ultimately adjusting prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proving your point is the great Barney Frank talking on News Hour Thursday in regards to Republican opposition to any federal assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure which is unacceptable to the Reps but the Bear Stearns bailout was fine.</p>
<p>REP. TOM PRICE: Well, how &#8212; how do you get to the bottom of this housing problem and challenge that we have? You get to the bottom when the market determines that housing prices have fallen to an appropriate amount. And, hopefully, we still believe that markets ought to be how we determine what housing prices ought to be, and not that the government ought to be determining that.</p>
<p>When we get to that bottom, then housing prices will &#8212; the demand will increase and housing prices will begin to come up. You can&#8217;t artificially change that by congressional action, by governmental action.</p>
<p>When you try to do that, all you do is manipulate the market and, I believe, prolong the challenges and the pain that &#8212; that we&#8217;re feeling. And, just as a point on that $300 billion, it&#8217;s extremely important. The chairman is very accurate in what he says all the time. And he&#8217;s very accurate in what he puts in bills. And the $300 billion is in there for a reason.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s because that&#8217;s the ultimate exposure if in fact the worst thing would happen &#8212; were to happen. And that&#8217;s important to appreciate.</p>
<p>REP. BARNEY FRANK: That&#8217;s the silliest thing people will hear today, even if they watch the Cartoon Network. That would be if every mortgage totally failed, and you recovered nothing from it.</p>
<p>By the way, I probably shouldn&#8217;t have been here, because Mr. Price could have debated himself, because when he says have the government stay out of the market, that contradicts his bragging about FHA Secure and the HOPE NOW, which were also government interventions in the market.</p>
<p>MARGARET WARNER: Congressman&#8230;</p>
<p>REP. BARNEY FRANK: So, there&#8217;s just a total contradiction here about what you do or don&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>MARGARET WARNER: OK.</p>
<p>But, Congressman Frank, let me get you to respond to Congressman Price&#8217;s point that, essentially, by doing this, you&#8217;re creating a &#8212; basically a false floor under house prices and that the only way to get out of this is just let them fall where they&#8217;re going to fall and then come back.</p>
<p>REP. BARNEY FRANK: Well, the answer, first of all, is, if he really believed that, he wouldn&#8217;t be bragging about FHA Secure and the other federal program. So, there&#8217;s a kind of contradiction there.</p>
<p>Secondly, no, this is not stopping prices from going. As a matter of fact, this begins with the holders of the mortgages being told, you better reduce the amount you think you&#8217;re going to get.</p>
<p>And we are only going to give a guarantee if they get down to 85 percent of the appraised value. The government isn&#8217;t appraising. The government is going to rely on private appraisers. No, we assume prices are going to be going down. And there&#8217;s nothing in here that&#8217;s going to stop prices from going down.</p>
<p>Again, the lender is being told, you&#8217;re not going to get what that mortgage says. And, by the way, that&#8217;s 85 percent of the value of the house. It will be less than 85 percent of the value of these loans, because the loans are above the value of the house. So, we&#8217;re telling the lender, you&#8217;re going to have to take a very substantial reduction in what you thought you could get if you want to participate in this.</p>
<p>And, so, there&#8217;s no &#8212; no one is stopping the market from ultimately adjusting prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Earthshaking Science by a2</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/05/02/earthshaking-science/#comment-849</link>
		<author>a2</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/05/02/earthshaking-science/#comment-849</guid>
					<description>These are WONDERFUL. I especially like the story of your army insecticide and God's whiskers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are WONDERFUL. I especially like the story of your army insecticide and God&#8217;s whiskers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yearning to Breathe Free by Linda Griffin</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/13/yearning-to-breathe-free/#comment-844</link>
		<author>Linda Griffin</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/13/yearning-to-breathe-free/#comment-844</guid>
					<description>....gasp....hold on....'til november....gasp....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.gasp&#8230;.hold on&#8230;.&#8217;til november&#8230;.gasp&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lost in a Sea of Numbers by mike</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/28/lost-in-a-sea-of-numbers/#comment-843</link>
		<author>mike</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/28/lost-in-a-sea-of-numbers/#comment-843</guid>
					<description>Very interesting to see it graphed out. Seriously, you should start an official Poll rating service - like Morningstar but for Polls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to see it graphed out. Seriously, you should start an official Poll rating service - like Morningstar but for Polls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comex Comix by mike</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/28/comex-comix/#comment-842</link>
		<author>mike</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/28/comex-comix/#comment-842</guid>
					<description>Vintage Al! Bravo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vintage Al! Bravo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Thing That Wouldn&#8217;t Leave by mike</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-840</link>
		<author>mike</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-840</guid>
					<description>Clinton on top of the ticket only  because she can bowl her age.
I do think if Obama proposed it, he would get instant legendary "Great Uniter" status which gives you extra leg-room on long flights.

Rahm Emanuel said on C Rose that everything hangs on how the losing Dem loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton on top of the ticket only  because she can bowl her age.<br />
I do think if Obama proposed it, he would get instant legendary &#8220;Great Uniter&#8221; status which gives you extra leg-room on long flights.</p>
<p>Rahm Emanuel said on C Rose that everything hangs on how the losing Dem loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Thing That Wouldn&#8217;t Leave by Mark</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-839</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-839</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I mostly worry that a continued Democratic fight only helps McCain, and I can't understand why you'd give an edge to a weak candidate like that.  There is only one remaining scenario that give HRC a popular vote edge (with FL/MI) and even that is small.  Obama leads all other summaries, and there just aren't any blowout opportunities on the calendar.  I agree with you that the superdelegates will have to follow the popular vote.

But I don't get a ticket with both (and I really don't get why it is always suggested with HRC at the top ... she's losing against any metric that counts!).

And jeez .... Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry and Gore ... what a lineup.  Hasn't been anything like it since the '62 Mets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I mostly worry that a continued Democratic fight only helps McCain, and I can&#8217;t understand why you&#8217;d give an edge to a weak candidate like that.  There is only one remaining scenario that give HRC a popular vote edge (with FL/MI) and even that is small.  Obama leads all other summaries, and there just aren&#8217;t any blowout opportunities on the calendar.  I agree with you that the superdelegates will have to follow the popular vote.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t get a ticket with both (and I really don&#8217;t get why it is always suggested with HRC at the top &#8230; she&#8217;s losing against any metric that counts!).</p>
<p>And jeez &#8230;. Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry and Gore &#8230; what a lineup.  Hasn&#8217;t been anything like it since the &#8216;62 Mets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Thing That Wouldn&#8217;t Leave by mike</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-838</link>
		<author>mike</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-838</guid>
					<description>I sure don't want McCain but there is a lot of dislike for Obama and Clinton as well inside there own party. I hope they will get the big blue and swing states anyway.   I am not sure how the losers of the Dem race will react.  I think there will be a significant defection to McCain in Ohio and Pennsylvania and Florida for example if Obama is nominated.

There is a real question here about who is more likely to win in November against McCain. 

I don't think the Dems' "super-delegates" are capable of picking Hillary even if she wins the popular vote- they will greatly fear being defined as racists at that point - which doesn't make them very super in my opinion.

Clinton/Obama people!

We the party of Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry and Gore will prevail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure don&#8217;t want McCain but there is a lot of dislike for Obama and Clinton as well inside there own party. I hope they will get the big blue and swing states anyway.   I am not sure how the losers of the Dem race will react.  I think there will be a significant defection to McCain in Ohio and Pennsylvania and Florida for example if Obama is nominated.</p>
<p>There is a real question here about who is more likely to win in November against McCain. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the Dems&#8217; &#8220;super-delegates&#8221; are capable of picking Hillary even if she wins the popular vote- they will greatly fear being defined as racists at that point - which doesn&#8217;t make them very super in my opinion.</p>
<p>Clinton/Obama people!</p>
<p>We the party of Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry and Gore will prevail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Thing That Wouldn&#8217;t Leave by Mark</title>
		<link>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-837</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://horse-you-rode-in-on.com/2008/04/27/the-thing-that-wouldnt-leave/#comment-837</guid>
					<description>Okay, but that is highly hypothetical.  If the Democratic primaries were all winner-take-all, I assume BHO would have run a different style of campaign.  Instead, they have optimized their strategy to learn caucus rules where caucuses matter, and do standard media saturation, etc. in proportional or winner-take-all scenarios.  The game is to win it so you can participate in the general, and to date BHO has demonstrated a more optimal approach.

And I think that most of the big states that HRC is winning, most Democratic candidates would likely win in the general.  Obama looks stronger in the western states where HRC loses a McCain match-up.  Bush is staggeringly unpopular and McCain doesn't seem to be offering much more than his own blinking befuddlement.  

Obama/Mike 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, but that is highly hypothetical.  If the Democratic primaries were all winner-take-all, I assume BHO would have run a different style of campaign.  Instead, they have optimized their strategy to learn caucus rules where caucuses matter, and do standard media saturation, etc. in proportional or winner-take-all scenarios.  The game is to win it so you can participate in the general, and to date BHO has demonstrated a more optimal approach.</p>
<p>And I think that most of the big states that HRC is winning, most Democratic candidates would likely win in the general.  Obama looks stronger in the western states where HRC loses a McCain match-up.  Bush is staggeringly unpopular and McCain doesn&#8217;t seem to be offering much more than his own blinking befuddlement.  </p>
<p>Obama/Mike 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
